Europe ETP News Older Than 1 year-If your looking for specific news, using the search function will narrow down the results
London Stock Exchange promotes best practice in investor relations
New guide will help companies communicate effectively with investors
- Series of events planned
March 15, 2010--The London Stock Exchange is this week sending copies of a new edition of its guide to investor relations to the companies on its markets. “Investor Relations - A Practical Guide” provides practical assistance to companies, whether quoted or considering a stock market flotation, on best practice in investor relations, examining the key principles firms should consider when developing their investor relations strategy.
The Guide collates a wealth of expertise from a series of corporate advisers, quoted companies and investors, and details the latest developments affecting investor relations, including the Companies Act 2006 provisions for electronic shareholder communication and AIM Rule 26, covering website disclosure for AIM companies.
The Guide provides insight into:
• the key stakeholders involved; • which people, internally and externally, comprise a company’s investor relations team and their responsibilities; and • the tools and activities available to companies to effectively communicate their story to shareholders, potential investors, analysts and the media
Tracey Pierce, Head of Equity Primary Markets, London Stock Exchange Group, said:
“We are committed to providing the companies on our markets with the tools they need to communicate effectively with investors, and I feel sure that this guide, alongside our other initiatives, will help companies in building constructive long-term relationships with their investors and other stakeholders. Implementing a successful investor relations strategy is central to enhancing liquidity, gaining access to capital and can help create enhanced profile and a vibrant shareholder community around a company’s stock.”
Tim Ward, CEO of the Quoted Companies Alliance, said:
“The most effective quoted companies see shareholder engagement as a long-term, on-going dialogue rather than an activity they undertake occasionally. A thorough ongoing IR programme takes many forms, including meetings with investors and journalists, meaningful annual reports and effective websites. The QCA is delighted to support this essential guide. The information contained in this guide will support companies’ understanding of these processes and the wider dynamics of shareholder engagement, helping the investment community to be more knowledgeable and confident about their current and prospective investments.”
Richard Davies, Chairman of the Investor Relations Society, said:
“Properly used, the investor relations team will be the eyes and ears of the company in the market and will deliver valuable insight into market sentiment. This guide will act as a valuable tool for companies seeking to establish an effective dialogue with their shareholders and other financial market participants, and we hope that best practice investor relations will be embraced by all management teams.”
The Guide will be officially launched at the Exchange’s offices in Paternoster Square in April. The Exchange will also be arranging a series of roundtable meetings for companies around the UK to promote the importance of investor relations.
view the Investor Relations - A Practical Guide
Source: London Stock Exchange
European Reform Barometer Spring 2010
Benchmarking our way out of the crisis
March15, 2010--Foreward--This report confirms the strong commitment of the European business community to cultivate a true benchmarking culture within the European Union and at the global level.
The EU’s pledge to exit from the crisis and support greater prosperity, job creation and economic stability on our continent will only be credible if it is ready to tackle structural impediments to growth at both EU and national level. This is where Europe’s untapped potential lies and is a necessary condition to restore fiscal sustainability and uphold Europe’s social model. It will require strong resolve for policy-makers to implement the necessary reforms and promote their benefits to society.
Benchmarking is a powerful device to pin down structural weaknesses at the national level, identify
priority areas for reform and foster policy learning across countries. It must be used both to communicate the gains of reforms and to exert pressure on governments tempted to shift the burden of adjustments into the future.
Previous attempts to coordinate structural reforms in the European context have failed mainly due to weak political ownership and accountability. This was the core reason for the disappointing results of the Lisbon Strategy launched in 2000 and expiring in 2010. This failure has dealt a blow to the credibility of the EU and its capacity to successfully coordinate national policies.
A new EU growth strategy is being put in place to get Europe back on track to prosperity and job creation. Europe cannot afford to fall short of expectations once again.
EU leaders have, with this new EU growth strategy, the chance to plant the seeds for a more effective system of governance to tackle the immense challenges ahead. Benchmarking and greater tenacity of EU institutions to name good performers and shame countries falling short of their commitments will need to be a key pillar of such a governance structure.
The report presents an evaluation of EU’s performance and individual country positions on key structural indicators in 2009, and their relative evolution since 2008. It then presents reform priorities as indentified by BUSINESSEUROPE members to exit the crisis and address the main growth bottlenecks at the Member State level. The report concludes with recommendations regarding ways of improving governance instruments for the new EU growth strategy.
view report
Source: Business Europe
The Race for Assets in the European Commodity Exchange-Traded Products market-Deutsche Bank Report
March 12, 2010--Highlights
As of March 5 2010, commodity exchange-traded products (C-ETPs) hosted €23.1 billion, split roughly 50/50 between exchange-traded commodities (ETCs) and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tracking commodity indices. Historically, ETFs (mostly targeting precious metals and general commodity index returns) held the lion's share, but that is about to change, with ETCs (that target primarily single commodity returns) about to overtake them. This is a shift that signals a change in investor risk appetite in the year ahead. We believe that this is due to (a) decreasing demand for gold, and, (b) increased interest in specific commodity return profiles.
The big winners (in terms of attracting assets) in 2010 will be industrial metals and indices tracking the broad market, while Swiss domiciled ETFs tracking gold will continue to grow. In terms of trading, Energy will remain a highly popular sub-sector, especially in light of a number of energy leveraged products being launched.
Continued AUM growth expected, in the region of 60%-80%, albeit slower than 2009 (145%), but higher turnover likely
2009 was an exceptional year and together with 2008, saw investment that proliferated commodities as an asset class in the ETP space. With the sector reaching a critical mass, marginal growth will be harder to achieve.
Overall we expect the C-ETP sector to continue experiencing inflows. The growth of the C-ETP sector will likely slow in 2010 from the 145% observed in 2009, but will remain healthy. We estimate growth between 60%-90% in the European C-ETP space for 2010.
Precious Metals flows likely to slow as these have now reached a fairly significant size of the industry. In addition, with the decrease of volatility in the equity markets, some gold flows are likely to be directed back to equity. The first two months of 2010 saw net outflows from UK based gold C-ETPs and net inflows for Swiss based gold C-ETPs.
Despite slowing flows, the gold C-ETPs remain the biggest single commodity sub-segment, (57%), with Overall commodity indices well below in second place (13%) and Broad Agricultural Indices in 3rd place (5%). Given the current size of the precious metals sub-segment, it is likely that it will maintain its dominance in 2010.
Very busy C-ETP launch calendar in the first two months of 2010
In anticipation and building on steady growth over the past couple of years, product launches in the first two months of 2010 were very strong, totaling 45 YTD 2010, compared with 66 for the entire 2009. Five existing providers came to market with new C-ETP products.
Swiss managers launched 26 ETFs (primarily targeting long gold returns denominated in a number of currencies besides CHF) employing physical replication. EU providers launched ETC and ETN products targeting a wide range of non precious metals commodity benchmarks.
Non precious metal commodities continue to attract investment but at a rate slower than 2009, gold inflows are regionally split
2009 saw net inflows in all six commodity sectors (Agriculture, Broad Indices, Energy, Industrial Metals, Livestock and Precious Metals), totalling €9.7 billion (average €800 million per month).
Overall C-ETPs in 2010 YTD saw €631 million of net inflows for the first two months of 2010, with outflows of €32 million in Agriculture and €67 million in Energy, primarily driven from Brent Oil (€31 million) and WTI (€21million).
2010 YTD average monthly net inflows stand at €316 million, 25% lower the respective number for 2009, €425 million.
Given the busy product launch calendar we expect inflows to pick up over the second and third quarter of 2010. As more long and short products become available on a number of the dominant C-ETP sectors (short precious metals, Oil, Agriculture), these products will increasingly find a home with institutional investors and active value traders looking for value as the year progresses.
Energy remains the most traded C-ETP sector, at 2.7 times that of overall C-ETPs
Overall C-ETP average monthly AUM-normalized turnover (Turnover/AUM) in 2010 is at levels comparable to 2009, with agriculture and industrial metals showing slightly higher levels than their respective prior year.
The highest AUM-normalized monthly turnover continues to be observed in the Energy (0.45) sector, remaining 2.7 times that of the overall C-ETP equivalent number (0.17)
Turnover for non-precious metals C-ETPs will likely increase as more products become available and they continue gaining popularity with institutional investors and active traders. These are likely to become investment tools for traders hoping to benefit from changing economic trends.
C-ETP fee structure transparency is becoming an issue
We estimate that the average cost of investing in a C-ETP ranges between 0.67% and 1.22%, a range that is higher from the average prospectus stated total expense ratio, which on average ranges between 0.51% and 0.67%. The difference is attributable to a number of other costs which result from enhancements to the C-ETP structures (for example collateral provision cost) as well as replication related fees such as swap spreads and index licensing fees. The cost of leveraged C-ETPs is on average 40 bps over their respective long cousins. These costs will likely drop as the market becomes more competitive and additional providers enhance their product ranges.
ETN issuer counterparty risk: an incentive for the use of these instruments by short term investors?
ETN holders have direct counterparty risk to the issuer as ETNs rank pari-passu with the issuer’s other general senior unsecured debt. However, the ETNs’ pricing does not incorporate a credit spread for the investor taking on issuer counterparty risk. The ETN issuers will typically redeem these notes at the ETN’s target benchmark valuation but if redemptions are suspended and the secondary market is the only source of liquidity credit spreads will likely apply. The experience in the US suggests that these instruments have mostly been popular with short term holders, usually intraday, where counterparty risk is not a major issue. Therefore these are more likely to be trader’s instruments.
Return measurement: Excess or total return?
C-ETP investments are funded investments as the investor pays up-front 100% cash to obtain exposure; therefore total return (asset/future return +funding return) is the relevant return to use. Several providers in the market deduct the cost of providing collateral, which in the current market is close to the cost of funding, from total return, essentially transforming the C-ETP’s return into an ‘excess’ return. Collateralization makes structures safer and it is very desirable, and since direct spot exposure is largely unattainable for most commodities (with the exception of precious metals), a C-ETP structuring mechanism is necessary. A fine balance needs to be struck between collateral charges (payable by investors) and funding returns (receivable by investors). The economic fundamentals of the collateral’s underlying market play a big role in assessing this dynamic balance as they are likely to vary over time. These considerations are particularly important in a low interest rate environment, such as the current.
Source: Deutsche Bank Index Research-Europe
Equity ETF Review 2009-ETF Securities
March 12, 2010--Global equity markets rallied strongly in 2009, with resource-related equities
leading the charge. The rally took place following severe market declines in 2H
2008 and 1Q 2009 caused by the worst financial crisis in 50 years. All of the long
equity ETFs on the ETFX platform performed strongly, with the ETFX Global Coal
Mining Fund (COAL) leading the pack with a 138% return.
The best performers on the ETFX ETF platform were resource-related ETFs,
benefitting from cyclical recovery in the developed world and continued robust
demand from key emerging market economies – particularly China. After COAL,
the best performing thematic ETFX ETFs in 2009 were ETFX Dow Jones STOXX
600 Basic Resources Fund (BRES), up 114%; ETFX DAXglobal Steel Fund
(STEE), up 79%; and ETFX S-Net ITG Global Agri Business Fund, up 53%.
Leveraged equity ETFs also did well, with ETFX FTSE® 100 Leveraged (2x) Fund
up 55%.>
As we move into 2010 the key question is whether the strong performance of risk assets can continue. Long-term structural factors remain strongly favourable for the resource sector as rising per capita incomes in large population emerging markets continues to drive demand for energy, metals, agriculture and related products. The shorter-term cyclical outlook is less clear as extraordinary government fiscal and monetary stimulus programs are pared back and the consequences of rising debt levels in developed economies raises concerns about sovereign risks, potential growth set-backs and inflation.
The ETFX ETF platform provides investors with the flexibility to make positive returns whether markets rise or fall. In the first two months of 2010, as high uncertainty has been the dominant theme, short ETFs have performed strongly, with the ETFX FTSE® 100 Super Short Strategy (2x) Fund (SEU2) surging 9%, followed by a 6% rise in the ETFX DAX® 2x Short Fund (DES2). In this report we outline the key factors driving the returns of the ETFs on the ETFX platform and assess of how these factors may affect performance in 2010.
for more info
Source: ETF Securities
London and New York lead world in latest Global Financial Centres report
March 12, 2010--London and New York are tied for first place in the latest Global Financial Centres (GFC) report, published today by the City of London Corporation.
The data was collected between July and December 2009, a period of considerable volatility as the global economic recovery got underway. London (-15 points in the ranking to 775 from 790) was one of four centres to see a decrease in its ratings (Shenzhen (-25), Guernsey (-6), and Dublin (-1)), despite an overall return of confidence. Meanwhile, New York (+1) held steady in the face of concerns over the regulatory environment.
Asian centres continued to make gains, with Hong Kong, Singapore, Tokyo, Shanghai and Beijing, in particular, all recording strong performances.
The study, the seventh of its kind produced by Z/Yen Group, also indicates that the gap between the top two and Hong Kong in third has narrowed. It now stands at 36 points, down from 45 in GFCI 6 and 81 in GFCI 5.
Stuart Fraser, Policy Chairman at the City of London Corporation, said:
'Although London and New York have always led the pack, this research is a wake-up call for decision-makers that our standing as a world-leading global financial centre should not be taken for granted. Damage has been done to the Square Mile's perceived competitiveness relative to New York but this is not irreversible provided the new incoming government – regardless of political persuasion – makes a clear, positive statement on their "direction of travel" with regard to tax and regulation. Not everything can be achieved at once but businesses need confidence that over the longer term the government of the day is supportive of the financial services industry as a wealth generator for the UK economy.
'We cannot afford to be complacent in the face of growing competition across the world, not just in the USA but also increasingly Asia. There is a danger that new regulation could accelerate this shift in the financial centre of gravity towards fast-developing markets by undermining the UK's competitiveness. Industry and government must work together to ensure that this does not happen.'
GFCI 6, published in September 2009, showed a general return of confidence among respondents - with all but three centres (Dublin, Glasgow and Gibraltar) recording stable or higher results than previous ratings.
The GFC report tracks the underlying competitiveness of financial centres. The rankings are compiled by the independent Z/Yen Group from surveys of finance professionals around the world and competitiveness indicators.
view the GFC-7 report
Source: City of London
US dollar yields greatest monthly real profit in February
March 12, 2010--Trading on the US dollar created the highest monthly real returns among investment instruments in February, 1.19 percent when adjusted for inflation according to the producer price index (PPI) and 1.4 percent under the consumer price index (CPI).
The Turkish Statistics Institute (TurkStat) on Friday released its latest report on the rates of real return yielded by investment instruments in February.
According to the report, last month deposit interest, the stock exchange, the euro and gold suffered monthly real loss at rates of 1.01, 5.85, 3 and 0.81 percent, respectively, when adjusted for the PPI.
read more
Source: Todays Zaman
Stocks to be included in ISE Stock Indices between 4/1/2010 and 6/30/2010
March 12, 2010--ISE 30, ISE 50 and ISE 100 indices will be revised as shown in the table below, for the second quarter of 2010 (4/1/2010 – 6/30/2010).
| Revisions as of 4/1/2010 | Substitute Stocks for the period between 4/1/2010-6/30/2010 | |||||
| Stocks to be included in ISE 100 Index | Stocks to excluded from ISE 100 Index | Substitute stocks for ISE 100 Index | ||||
| ÝPEK MATBAACILIK KONYA ÇÝMENTO | ÝZMÝR DEMÝR ÇELÝK PINAR ET VE UN | BRÝSA | ||||
| Stocks to be included in ISE 50 Index | Stocks to excluded from ISE 50 Index | Substitute stocks for ISE 50 Index | ||||
| AFYON ÇÝMENTO ÝÞ GMYO | YAPI KREDÝ SÝGORTA ÝHLAS EV ALETLERÝ | ÝHLAS HOLDÝNG BSH EV ALETLERÝ ASELSAN
| ||||
| Stocks to be included in ISE 30 Index | Stocks to excluded from ISE 30 Index | Substitute stocks for ISE 30 Index | ||||
| ECZACIBAÞI ÝLAÇ | AKSÝGORTA | T.S.K.B. HÜRRÝYET GZT. | ||||
Source: Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE)
FSA CEO outlines new conduct regulation strategy - consumer protection through early intervention
March 12, 2010--Hector Sants, chief executive of the Financial Services Authority (FSA), today outlined the FSA’s new consumer protection strategy. Speaking at the annual Lubbock Lecture at Oxford University’s Saïd Business School, Sants described how the regulator will deliver its new approach, involving early detection and intervention, through intensive supervision.
The FSA’s consumer protection strategy seeks to achieve three goals:
making the retail market work better for consumers;
avoiding the crystallisation of conduct risks that exceed the FSA’s risk tolerance; and
delivering credible deterrence and prompt and effective redress for consumers.
It signals the end of ‘reactive regulation’ where, historically, the FSA waited for clear evidence that a product had been mis-sold and consumers harmed before it took action and relied principally on risk disclosure information at the point of sale to avoid mis-selling occurring.
read more
Source:FSA.gov.uk
Industrial production up by 1.7% in euro area-Eurostat
January 2010 compared with December
Up by 1.8% in EU27
March 12, 2010--In January 2010 compared with December 2009, seasonally adjusted industrial production1 grew by 1.7% in the euro area2 (EA16) and by 1.8% in the EU272. In December 20093 production increased by 0.6% and 0.3% respectively. In January 2010 compared with January 2009, industrial production increased by 1.4% in the euro area and by 1.5% in the EU27.
Monthly comparison In January 2010 compared with December 2009, production of energy increased by 2.6% in the euro area and by 2.2% in the EU27. Durable consumer goods rose by 2.0% and 1.7% respectively. Intermediate goods grew by 1.4% in the euro area and by 0.3% in the EU27. Capital goods fell by 0.3% in the euro area, but gained 0.4% in the EU27. Non-durable consumer goods decreased by 0.3% in the euro area, but rose by 0.5% in the EU27. Among the Member States for which data are available, industrial production rose in thirteen and fell in six. The highest increases were registered in Ireland (+15.3%), Bulgaria (+4.9%), Estonia (+4.5%) and Denmark (+3.9%), and the largest falls in Portugal and Finland (both -2.2%), Latvia (-1.6%) and Spain (-1.1%). Annual comparison In January 2010 compared with January 2009, production of intermediate goods grew by 4.2% in the euro area and by 3.9% in the EU27. Capital goods increased by 0.5% and 1.7% respectively. Non-durable consumer goods remained stable in the euro area and rose by 0.2% in the EU27. Production of energy decreased by 0.6% and 2.4% respectively. Durable consumer goods declined by 1.9% in the euro area, but increased by 1.5% in the EU27.
Among the Member States for which data are available, industrial production rose in twelve and fell in seven. The highest increases were registered in Malta (+14.3%), Poland (+11.0%), the Czech Republic (+8.0%) and Romania (+6.8%). The largest decreases were registered in Denmark (-9.8%), Lithuania (-5.5%), Greece (-4.4%) and Spain (-2.5%).
view report
Source: Eurostat
Renewable energy: forecasts show EU on track to meet 20% target
March 11, 2010--The EU will surpass its target to consume 20 per cent of its energy from renewable energy by 2020, according to national forecasts submitted to the European Commission. In its summary published today, the Commission finds that the EU will reach an overall share of 20,3 per cent renewables.
Günther Oettinger, European Commissioner responsible for Energy said: "These forecasts show that Member States take renewable energy very seriously and are really dedicated to push their domestic production. It is an important milestone in the achievement of the goals set in the Europe 2020 Strategy. This is a very positive sign for the environment, as it will help us to cut CO2 emissions and at the same time enhance our energy security. It is also a very positive message for our economy and our companies. It is an incentive to invest in green technology and the production of renewable energy. Our task will be to help all Member States not only to reach the 20 per cent target but to go beyond".
The summary found that 10 out of 27 EU Member States are likely to exceed their national targets for renewable energy, with a further 12 set to meet their goals domestically. Only five Member States are currently expected not to meet their target with domestic sources only.
According to the Renewable Energy Directive (2009/28/EC), those Member States which consider that they cannot reach their targets with domestic resources alone, must either acquire transfers from other Member States or countries outside the EU. As the summary shows, this mechanism will only play a minor role. Only around 2 Mtoe of the total renewable energy needed in 2020, will be traded between Member States or third countries. In percentage terms this amounts to less than 1 per cent.
The priority will however remain to assist all Member States to reach the required target or, for those which are already close to the target, to go beyond it.
view the Member States' performance report
Source: Europa.com
If you are looking for a particuliar article and can not find it, please feel free to contact us for assistace.
